Key Takeaways
- The ACSI Restaurant and Food Delivery Study 2025 (released June 2025, covering data collected April 2024 - March 2025) surveyed customers across dine-in, carryout, and delivery experiences.
- These chains deliver satisfaction scores well above the industry average of 79.
- The chicken category shows the widest satisfaction spread:
- Getting the order right is the single most important satisfaction driver.
- Higher satisfaction scores correlate strongly with same-store sales growth:
Customer satisfaction drives repeat visits, and repeat visits drive profit. The American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) has been measuring how QSR chains stack up for over a decade, and the 2025-2026 data reveals clear winners, persistent losers, and a few surprises.
Here's every major quick-service restaurant ranked by actual customer satisfaction scores, based on surveys of thousands of real customers.
The Methodology#
The ACSI Restaurant and Food Delivery Study 2025 (released June 2025, covering data collected April 2024 - March 2025) surveyed customers across dine-in, carryout, and delivery experiences. Scores are on a 100-point scale.
The study includes feedback on:
- Food quality
- Order accuracy
- Speed of service
- Mobile app reliability
- Staff courtesy
- Value for money
- Overall satisfaction
The Complete Rankings#
The Elite Tier (80+)#
These chains deliver satisfaction scores well above the industry average of 79.
1. Chick-fil-A - 83#
Category: Chicken Streak: 11 consecutive years at #1
Chick-fil-A's dominance is unmatched. Despite longer wait times (average 8 minutes drive-thru), the chain delivers on:
- Order accuracy: 92-93% (industry-leading)
- Staff courtesy: Consistently rated highest
- Customer loyalty: ~99% satisfaction rate
The "my pleasure" culture isn't just marketing. It shows up in measurable outcomes.
2-4. Premium Fast-Casual Tier - 82#
Full-Service Reference: 82 (industry average)
Several fast-casual concepts match full-service satisfaction:
- Panera Bread - Coffee and bakery strength
- Chipotle - Customization and perceived value
- MOD Pizza - Build-your-own format appeal
The Strong Performers (80-82)#
Chains in this range meet customer expectations consistently but lack the differentiation of Chick-fil-A.
- Panda Express - Asian QSR leader
- Five Guys - Premium burger experience
- In-N-Out Burger (regional) - Cult following
- Shake Shack - Elevated fast food
The Industry Average (79)#
QSR Industry Baseline: 79
The typical quick-service experience delivers satisfaction in the high 70s. Chains hovering here include:
- Wendy's - ~79
- Arby's - ~79
- Carl's Jr./Hardee's - ~78-79
- Sonic - ~78
The Major Players (75-79)#
The biggest chains by footprint often score in the mid-to-high 70s, reflecting the challenge of consistency at scale.
McDonald's - 75-76#
Locations: 13,000+ U.S. Satisfaction Trend: Declining from 78 in recent years
The Golden Arches faces persistent complaints about:
- Ice cream machine reliability
- Order accuracy (especially via app/kiosk)
- Speed of service during peak hours
But recent improvements in digital ordering and Loyalty Programs Are the New Moat: How Starbucks, McDonald's, and Chick-fil-A Weaponized First-Party Data showing positive momentum.
Burger King - 75-76#
Parent: Restaurant Brands International Challenge: franchise calculator consistency
Burger King's satisfaction scores vary dramatically by location, with corporate-owned stores often outperforming franchisees.
Taco Bell - 77-78#
Category: Mexican-Inspired Strength: Value perception, menu innovation
Taco Bell does well on value and speed (fastest drive-thru at 4.3 minutes), but food quality perception remains a limiter.
Subway - 76-77#
Challenge: Post-scandal recovery Improvement: Menu refresh, store remodels
Subway is slowly recovering from years of declining scores, but still trails leaders by significant margins.
The Strugglers (72-75)#
Chains in this range face meaningful satisfaction deficits and often see traffic declines as a result.
KFC - 73#
Trend: Erosion from previous years Issues: Inconsistent food quality, out-of-stock items
KFC's satisfaction dropped notably in 2024-2025, a concerning trend for Yum Brands.
Popeyes - 74#
Paradox: Viral menu items, inconsistent execution
Popeyes can create cultural moments (the chicken sandwich wars), but translating that into consistent daily satisfaction remains elusive.
Domino's - 74-75#
Category: Pizza delivery Competition: Third-party delivery apps
Domino's faces unique challenges as customers increasingly comparison tool it to the entire universe of delivery options, not just pizza chains.
The Bottom Tier (Below 72)#
These chains face serious satisfaction challenges that correlate with declining traffic and sales.
Jack in the Box - 72#
Regional: Primarily West Coast Issues: Menu confusion, inconsistent quality
The sprawling menu creates operational complexity that hurts execution.
Dunkin' - 73-74#
Category: Coffee and breakfast Challenge: Starbucks comparison
As Dunkin' shifted to beverage focus, food quality perceptions have suffered.
Category Breakdowns#
Chicken Chains#
The chicken category shows the widest satisfaction spread:
- Chick-fil-A - 83
- Raising Cane's - 79-80 (estimated)
- Wingstop - 78-79
- Popeyes - 74
- KFC - 73
Burger Chains#
Burgers remain the most competitive and lowest-satisfaction category:
- Five Guys - 80-81
- In-N-Out - 80 (West Coast only)
- Shake Shack - 80
- Whataburger - 78 (regional)
- Wendy's - 79
- McDonald's - 75-76
- Burger King - 75-76
- Jack in the Box - 72
Coffee Chains#
Coffee satisfaction is high, but competition is fierce:
- Starbucks - 77-78
- Dunkin' - 73-74
- Tim Hortons - 76-77
- Dutch Bros - 80+ (drive-thru specialist)
- Scooter's Coffee - 78-79
Mexican/Tex-Mex#
This category balances value and satisfaction better than most:
- Chipotle - 82
- Qdoba - 79-80
- Moe's Southwest Grill - 78-79
- Taco Bell - 77-78
- Del Taco - 75-76
What Drives Satisfaction? The Key Metrics#
Order Accuracy - 85/100 (Top Factor)#
Getting the order right is the single most important satisfaction driver. Chick-fil-A leads at 92-93% accuracy. Industry average is 85-87%.
What hurts accuracy:
- Complex customization options
- Drive-thru communication issues
- Digital order translation errors
- Understaffed kitchen during peak hours
Mobile App Quality - 84-85/100#
App reliability and ease of use rank just behind accuracy. Chains with strong app satisfaction:
- Chick-fil-A
- Starbucks
- Chipotle
- Panera
Chains with app struggles:
- McDonald's (kiosk/app order confusion)
- Burger King (glitchy loyalty program)
Food Quality - 84/100#
Perceived food quality has declined industry-wide (down 1% YoY in 2025).
Customer complaints:
- Smaller portions
- Temperature issues (cold fries, lukewarm burgers)
- Inconsistent preparation
Staff Courtesy - 84/100#
Friendly service remains a differentiator. Chick-fil-A's purposeful culture training shows measurable returns.
The courtesy gap:
- Chick-fil-A: ~90/100
- Industry average: 84/100
- Bottom performers: 78-80/100
Speed of Service#
Satisfaction with speed varies by channel:
- Dine-in: 81/100
- Carry-out: 79/100 (down 5% YoY)
- Delivery: 74/100 (down 9% YoY)
Delivery satisfaction is plummeting as third-party apps introduce new friction (driver issues, temperature, cost).
Website Satisfaction - 84/100#
Online ordering, menu browsing, and loyalty program interfaces all factor in. Starbucks and Chipotle lead; legacy chains lag.
Beverage Quality - 84/100#
Coffee, soft drinks, and specialty beverages score high when done well, but fountain drink complaints (wrong syrup ratios, flat carbonation) are common.
The Satisfaction-to-Traffic Correlation#
Higher satisfaction scores correlate strongly with same-store sales growth:
83+ Score (Chick-fil-A): +8-10% comp sales growth 79-82 Score: +2-5% comp sales growth 75-78 Score: Flat to +2% Below 75: Negative comp sales likely
Why Some Chains Score Low Despite High Sales#
McDonald's Paradox:
- Satisfaction: 75-76
- U.S. Revenue: $50+ billion
- Locations: 13,000+
Why the disconnect?
- Convenience wins - Location density makes it default choice
- Value perception - Dollar menu keeps price-sensitive customers coming
- Brand strength - Decades of top-of-mind awareness
- Kids' appeal - Happy Meals drive family visits regardless of adult satisfaction
But long-term, declining satisfaction predicts market share loss to higher-rated competitors.
Regional Variations#
Satisfaction scores vary by market:
California:
- In-N-Out dominates with 80+ scores
- McDonald's scores lower (73-74) due to higher expectations
Southeast:
- Chick-fil-A stronghold
- Zaxby's and Bojangles score well regionally
Northeast:
- Dunkin' scores higher at home (75-76) than national average
- Tim Hortons stronger in border markets
Texas:
- Whataburger scores 78-80 (well above national burger average)
- Brand loyalty drives satisfaction premium
The Delivery Disaster#
Satisfaction with delivery has collapsed:
2023: 81/100 2024: 78/100 2025: 74/100
Why delivery satisfaction is plummeting:
- Temperature issues (food arrives cold)
- Incorrect orders with no recourse
- High fees reduce value perception
- Driver behavior and timeliness inconsistency
- Third-party app experiences vary wildly
Chains are responding:
- Building proprietary delivery fleets
- Improving packaging for temperature retention
- Offering app-exclusive deals to offset delivery costs
What High-Satisfaction Chains Do Differently#
Chick-fil-A's Playbook#
- Selective hiring - Personality and attitude over experience
- Intensive training - Multi-week onboarding, not just videos
- Empowered employees - Authority to fix problems on the spot
- Limited menu - Fewer items = better execution
- Closed Sundays - Staff retention through better work-life balance
Five Guys' Premium Strategy#
- Fresh ingredients - Never frozen beef, hand-cut fries
- Free extras - Unlimited toppings at no charge
- Transparency - Open kitchen, potato sack displays
- Generous portions - Overflowing fries bag creates "wow" moment
Chipotle's Customization Edge#
- Assembly line visibility - Customers see their food made
- Ingredient quality - "Food with integrity" positioning
- Digital innovation - Best-in-class app and loyalty program
- Problem resolution - Fast digital refunds for issues
The Path Forward for Low Scorers#
Chains scoring below 75 need specific interventions:
Operations fixes:
- Simplify menus (fewer SKUs = better execution)
- Increase staffing during peak hours
- Upgrade kitchen equipment
- Implement better training programs
Technology investments:
- Fix mobile app glitches
- Improve kiosk interfaces
- Better kitchen display systems
- AI-assisted order accuracy
Cultural changes:
- Hire for attitude, train for skill
- Empower frontline workers to resolve issues
- Reduce employee turnover through better pay/benefits
- Create accountability for satisfaction metrics
The Bottom Line#
Customer satisfaction in QSR isn't random. It's the result of consistent execution across operations, technology, people, and culture.
The winners (Chick-fil-A, Five Guys, Chipotle) make intentional choices that prioritize satisfaction even when it costs more or limits growth speed.
The average performers (McDonald's, Burger King, Taco Bell) rely on scale, convenience, and value to offset satisfaction deficits.
The strugglers (KFC, Popeyes, Jack in the Box) face existential questions about whether their operational models can deliver satisfaction in a more demanding market.
In 2026, with more choices than ever and social media amplifying every bad experience, satisfaction scores aren't just nice to have. They're predictive indicators of long-term viability.
The chains at the top of this list are growing. The ones at the bottom are fighting for survival. The numbers don't lie.#
Related Reading#
- The Middle East QSR Boom: Why Every Major Chain Wants In
- The Regional Chain Advantage: Why Whataburger, Culver's, and Wawa Are Outperforming National Brands in Customer Satisfaction
- The Sustainability Scorecard: Where Major QSR Chains Actually Stand in 2026
- Chick-fil-A's Expansion Strategy: What Every Franchise Brand Can Learn
QSR Pro Staff
The QSR Pro editorial team covers the quick service restaurant industry with in-depth analysis, data-driven reporting, and operator-first perspective.
More from QSR